The following letter was passed on to me in
good faith by a woman who was deeply concerned by the proposal of the Anglican
Diocese of Sydney to re-introduce the word ‘submit’ into the marriage vows, such
that the wife promises to ‘submit’ to her husband.
The Archbishop and others who support the
amendment to the current marriage liturgy argue that they are simply reproducing
the language of the old liturgy. That may be correct, but it fails to take into
account the ways that such words can be used to justify abuse!
Father Dave
I am writing from Vancouver, Canada. I was under the ministry of clergy from
the diocese of Sydney, (who were working in Vancouver) for 15 years. I was
already married when we began to attend a church with a minister from Sydney.
When I was married I had vowed to obey my husband. He was violent and punished
every infraction of mine if I was not totally submissive. He hit me and said as
he was hitting me that it was my fault since I had vowed to obey. I lived with
this violence for 20 years. After a neighbour called the police, he stopped
hitting me but often restrained me in my room, threatening to hit me, and
yelling at me for hours.
In all the time that we attended this church, the minister preached that
wives must submit. There was no mention ever of domestic violence, and no
mention of help for abused wives. I never did go to the minister for help, but
once I asked the minister’s wife for a book for a “friend” who was in an abusive
relationship. She did not offer any resources at all. She said that she didn’t
have any books on that topic and didn’t need them because there were no abused
wives in our congregation.
In one sermon the minister said that God had put the husband in charge and
the wife must submit. Then he said that for women with a good husband this was
good, and for women with lousy husbands, they could have therapy after the
sermon. As he said this he laughed, and of course, it was just a joke, no
therapy was actually offered. I felt that he was laughing at women who lived
with abuse.
My ex husband would cite the minister in support of his demand that I be
obedient. I am very upset that the diocese now wants to use a vow to submit in
the marriage vows. I would like my story of criminal assault by my husband made
public. I was assaulted in my complementarian marriage and clergy from Sydney
had no training whatsoever to deal with this.
I have written to my former minister, no reply, and I have written to the
professional standards office of the diocese of Sydney. Someone there wrote that
he would get in touch with me. However, I want to share my story before the
synod ratifies the vow to submit, since I was taunted with this vow for 30
years, and for 20 of those years, I was hit every two weeks routinely, in
sessions lasting several hours, berating me for noncompliance with the vow to
obey. Of course, I have to pay for my own therapy, as well as therapy for my
children. The diocese of Sydney has not helped me in any way.
Thank you for listening to my story.
Bill...Father Dave might listen... but this poor lady's plea will fall on deaf ears within the Sydney Diocese. Nobody advocates for women...complementarianism is about the behavioural modification and female responsiveness of women to men. Bill..if a complementarian woman marries a bad man ...or a control freak...then she modifies her behaviour so she doesn't make him angry.
Yeah Calam...sounds like Sydney Anglican misogyny has spread far and wide...it's really disgusting that the diocese has not taken responsibility for its misogyny and apologised to women!
I did think that the assumptions you have made about the meaning of my déjà vu statement on the ABC has taken things a little too far.
EG "The implication, hint hint, is Change did not work for me, and therefore it cannot for Haydn. We have many things in common: both were/are married, have two daughters, identify as Christian, and even once/do attend the same church, therefore expect him to go down the same track that I have. Haydn’s really gay, and nothing he can say or do to the contrary will change that. Haydn, why fight yourself? There is no integrity in that. Why stick to your wife and children and deny ‘who you are’ and live with a ‘lack of integrity’ when you can join others who ‘understand you’? You’re ‘lying’ to yourself and everybody else and one day you can and should leave your family because it’s all a hopeless sham."
These are rather heartless statements and assumptions that I wouldn't make. You and I do have many similarities in our journey. Fortunately I have not had to deal with sexual abuse or a tortured relationship with my family as you seem to have had. Your brief time living as a gay man with the many meaningless and often anonymous sexual encounters is tragic. I lived like that myself for some time before I got married. And like you some of that continued during my marriage life. It appears from what you have said and written that this was mostly at beats, sauna's or a part of the gay 'scene'. I am not sure...this has never been fully clarified. My life today though living as an openly gay man is very very different. Its moral, full of wonderful people and most of my gay friends are in monogamous committed relationships. You and I previously were obviously moving in the wrong circles.
This is certainly not just about me. ....my story or your story. We now have 40 years of 'ex-gay' history to draw on. That patterns are quite clear. I have worked with 100's of people like myself and like you. Currently I am working with a high profile ex-gay leader in the US who is in the process of facing the reality late 50's. And another man I worked with recently early 60's. When you speak about the decisions and choices people like us have had to make you make it sound like the issue was that we left the marriage to live a 'gay life' you seem to be insinuating it is about sex and that we choose selfishly. Or that we have 'given in' to our homosexuality. This is very far from the truth and demonstrates that you are unaware of the personal pain we have experienced in coming to a place of acceptance. Believe me it was and is never that easy. It's unfair that you speak so demeaningly about this.
I do feel sad for you.....and your wife. This is not a condescending sadness in any way. It is genuine compassion having experienced myself some of your pain and seen how my former wife also suffered. You have blogged about your unfaithfulness and betrayal of your marriage vows. I am saddened to read that in such a public space and wonder what impact these sorts of disclosures have on your wife's mental health and sense of self worth.
A women recently emailed me her story after Ron Brookman said at the marriage equality committee that he had recently performed the marriage of 3 men who were 'former homosexuals' .
"My story... I am straight and I was married to a closeted gay Christian man. This is a scenario that occurs over and over again in the Christian world. The gay man or women has heard all their lives from the pulpit that they are an "abomination". Mostly there is never even a distinction made between same-sex attraction/orientation and same-sex behaviour. So gay Christians learn to hide, to never be authentic, to never reveal their struggles. They marry a person of the opposite sex because that's what is expected. This is a marriage doomed to failure. The unsuspecting straight partner knows something is wrong but can't work out what. The gay partner eventually finds every excuse in the book to avoid intimacy and most often also becomes emotionally distant and detached, depressed and anxious. The straight partner has lost not only an intimate partner but also a friend and companion, and their self-esteem is quite often shattered in this facade of a marriage.
I'm sad for Ron Brookman's wife, and for the wives (and children if these marriages don't make it) of the other men he talks about in this interview. I'm sad for everyone who will believe what he says. I'm sad for myself... separated, now divorced from my Christian, closeted, gay-in-denial ex-husband (also in ministry). I'm sad for my ex-husband's first wife and children. I'm sad that he quite possibly will do this again to a 3rd woman because of fear and shame, and because of messages like this one from Ron Brookman that say that it's possible to be a "former homosexual". I support honesty, authenticity, and integrity. And... I should also have said that I'm very very sad for my ex-husband, and for all the unnecessary anxiety, depression, fear and shame that keeps him in the closet."
So we all suffer in this together in this terrible dilemma of being gay in a Christian culture that is ill-informed about sexual orientation.
How do I know all these things......from the experience of working with 100's of people who have tried the path of marriage....some used to attend Liberty....many other ex-gay style programs..
As always I am willing to dialogue or chat with you. Our meeting and the content will remain confidential if that is what you desire.