Monday, June 8, 2015

David Ould has the hide to criticise Hillsong for lack of discernment in having Mark Driscoll speak at a Hillsong event...when Sydney Anglicans had him speak at Moore College and St Andrew's Cathedral

No David...I think if we remove that plank from your eye...then your vision will be restored....but you being a Sydney Anglican... might like to get a second opinion from a male...because my position does not complement your ego... nor your ambition.

David Ould is becoming the new face of the Anglican Church League... since the old face has stepped aside from being all over the net! And David is upholding the hypocritical form displayed by Sydney Anglican fundamentalists. David criticises Hillsong for inviting Mark Driscoll... to speak at an event... but when it is pointed out that Sydney Anglicans actually had him speak at numerous events...including to students at Moore College.... and preaching at St Andrew's Cathedral... then David Ould claims... that no one knew what Mark Driscoll was like back then. In fact many people knew what Mark Driscoll was like... but much of what was published about him and by him ...reflected the Sydney Anglican stance. It was only after Mark Driscoll spoke ....and criticised ....the Sydney Anglican elders approach to evangelism.... that some Sydney Anglicans queried his approach. What is interesting is that the most prolific ....all over the net ....Sydney Anglican..... David Ould... remained quiet about Mark Driscoll....back then! But Mark Driscoll was a member of the The Gospel Coalition back then...Wouldn't like to snuff out any future opportunities!

You know that UK priest, Fr David Heron, alerted Anglicans to Mark Driscoll through his satirical blog ...the one the Ould's and Sydney Anglicans forced him to shut down (on numerous occasions) ...because he criticised Sydney Anglicans for travelling all over the world inciting hatred against gays... and because laughed at Peter Ould for declaring himself a self proclaimed  expert on homosexuality ...and for taking offence to Peter Ould's twin .... David Ould...who was criticising same-sex attracted people in the church and calling for their sacking on his blog and the right wing evangelical Standfirm site...What a joke... Standfirm had established itself as a major influence in promoting right wing evangelical politics throughout the worldwide C of E. Standfirm's writers obviously believed that others were not allowed to criticise them ...let alone laugh at their postings.
You know Fr David Heron was threated with blackmail ...and when he wouldn't cower to these bullies...was forced to apologise as part of  a litigation process brought on by David Ould.  Fundamentalist evangelical thinking rationalises that being offensive through satire cannot be tolerated...but being down right offensive and hypocritical through evangelical Jensenism is OK.
Fr Heron's blog was very popular ....those who like/d to be all over the net must have been getting jealous at the time. Anyways Calam...History will eventually tell the tale.

Well I had a similar experience with that Mark Driscoll character....I posted a satirical piece about Mark Driscoll being a wanker expert...which he is...and blow me down my blog was sabotaged by people having a go at Fr David Heron.... Seriously how could David Ould who is all over the net...and the Sydney Anglican Church League...not know about Mark Driscoll's writings...when Fr David Heron and I knew what he was like?  I mean Mark Driscoll wrote for  The Gospel Coalition ...just like David Ould reports that he does.  

Now take note ladies ...Mark Driscoll is right... I am a blokey bloke... and as Mark Driscoll says in the Porn-Again Christian ... Masterbation
can be a form of homosexuality...and ladies make sure you give your husbands a blow job tonight....What ...can he reciprocate? Only if you don't gain any pleasure from it!
Mark Driscoll also wrote...Without blushing, Paul is simply stating that when it comes to leading in the church, women are unfit because they are more gullible and easier to deceive than men. While many irate women have disagreed with his assessment through the years, it does appear from this that such women who fail to trust his instruction and follow his teaching are much like their mother Eve and are well-intended but ill-informed. . . Before you get all emotional like a woman in hearing this, please consider the content of the women’s magazines at your local grocery store that encourages liberated women in our day to watch porno with their boyfriends, master oral sex for men who have no intention of marrying them, pay for their own dates in the name of equality, spend an average of three-fourths of their childbearing years having sex but trying not to get pregnant, and abort 1/3 of all babies. . . and ask yourself if it doesn’t look like the Serpent is still trolling the garden and that the daughters of Eve aren’t gullible in pronouncing progress, liberation, and equality (p. 43).

And Jesus...Liberal Anglicans were supposed to keep their mouths shut while Sydney Anglicans promoted this trash?



  1. Yes - Sydney Anglicans like to rewrite history. Ould has claimed elsewhere that evangelicals abolished slavery. This is simply wrong. It was the quakers who first raised their voices against slavery. Many southern US evangelicals defended slavery vehemently arguing with the same warped logic that people like Mark Driscoll argue with. Those evangelicals that did come aboard were not of the same ilk - they were compassionate and thoughtful people unlike Sydney evangelicals today. Sydney evangelicals will be on the wrong side of history on the gay marriage debate as well. I can just seem them trying to scramble around that in the future too.

    1. Slavery was abolished in different ways in different parts of the world - there was no single 'abolition of slavery' by the likes of Wilberforce, as the evangelicals would have us believe.