data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/027e5/027e51ef91021e74990113768660545f311713a1" alt=""
Phillip Jensen believes in middle ground when it comes to the climate change debate as outlined in his article... However, when groups with particular vested political interests use science to promote their view, it is science itself that comes under attack. When ‘evolution’ and ‘intelligent design’ are weapons in the hands of atheists and theists, it is very hard to weigh accurately the evidence. When catastrophists and sceptics discuss global warming, the truth is lost in politics and sadly for us, science itself gets a bad name. Phillip Jensen goes onto say...Certainly the consensus of scientists around the world should not be lightly discounted but the evidence of one scientist (or even a non-scientist) is as important as the collective understanding of the many.
Sydney Anglican management are so moderate in their attitude to science, that the Intelligent Design curriculum is taught in their schools at the discretion of the school principal!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54872/548727daab9a785cda41d90fd22456dcdd84e5fe" alt=""
Then why do Sydney Anglicans believe in literal Biblical interpretation but see the early parts of Genisis as figurative?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00650/00650b8286ee7fcae33d5408de77ab8da0aeaeda" alt=""
Now Dorothy...you didn't really think all that Jesus stuff was about love, did you?
No comments:
Post a Comment